Friday, November 2, 2007

Invasion of the Podcasters

For those of us who grew up with stories like Invasion of the Body Snatchers, the word “podcast” has an ominous tone. I mean, think about it for a second. Roll the words slowly and majestically off your tongue. Podcast. Pod people. Now ask yourself who’s making all those podcasts out there. Kind of gives you a Twilight Zone feeling doesn’t it? And I’m just talking about the word. I haven’t even gotten to the content or purpose of podcasting yet. Scary, huh?

Heh, heh. Just kidding. That was kind of mean of me, wasn’t it?

In this day and age, with more and more adults returning to school or engaging in new training programs—whether to advance in their professions or just for the sense of purpose and accomplishment that learning gives—it’s important that educators find ways to accommodate the working adult’s busy schedule in the classroom environment. Podcasts strike me as one viable classroom or lecture alternative (probably best used in conjunction with other learning tools, such as asynchronous classroom forums and assignment blogs) in that they allow individuals to learn at home at the hours most convenient to their schedules—even, potentially, while doing other household chores. Podcasts also help engage different types of learners in an otherwise primarily visual online classroom environment.

Podcasts come in many forms, and—as with audiobooks, if I may say so—much depends on the narrator. Some podcasts, such as PLCMC's 7 1/2 habits of Highly Successful Lifelong Learners are essentially PowerPoints, with a narrator reading along with and occasionally embellishing on a series of slides. Personally, in the absence of a really engaging presenter, I find this type of podcast rather unappealing, as my tendency is to just read the slides, and then click next while the narrator is still limping placidly forward like a disinterested cow with no collie to herd it towards the barn.

Other podcasts are more like audiobooks or audiojournals, if you will, and these I find much more engaging, as I can cook dinner, clean house, and do dishes while listening. (Ah, multi-tasking is my friend.) Having been charged to find a podcast that interests me, I searched the internet until I found Escape Pod, “The Science Fiction Podcast Magazine” for readers and writers of science fiction. Who knew there was such a thing? Now I can listen to reviews, preview the writing of hot new authors, and even download “podiobooks” to enjoy on my afternoon walk. Will the wonders never cease?

5 comments:

Cronehenge said...

I really disliked that 7 1/2 habits, blah blah badass podcast, as well. Reviewed it on OOOOH How I loved That Movie...a while ago. Guess for some assignment or extra.

Liked your poll but haven't read any or seen any so I couldn't vote on any Body Snatchers interps. Sigh.

Have a nice weekend!

Cronehenge said...

Oops! Sorry about the salty language in the former post. Maybe you want to delete that for delicate sensitivities, types?

Nothing personal towards the maker of podcast mentioned earlier...just didn't like format.

Sara F. said...

I'll take the 50's version of Invasion of the Body Snatchers, if only because it contains one of my favorite movie quotes ever:

"I'd been scared plenty of times in my life but I'd never known the true meaning of fear until I kissed Becky."

That's just brilliant. In context, it works, but out of context it's so melodramatic as to be absolutely hilarious.

(The new version was pretty but God, so depressing! "Our society sucks - it's better to be pods!" I will take the earlier messages about communists or suburbia over that any day.)

I have not yet seen the 70's one, alas, and so I cannot comment on it.

Constance said...

Hannah--I loved your review of the 7 1/2 podcast, even if I didn't love the podcast. If there are those out there who love the 7 1/2 podcast, well, different strokes for different folks!

Constance said...

The Body Snatcher Poll has closed and the 1956 black & white original version has won by a landslide, with Jack Finney's compactly written and thoughtful 1955 novel taking second place in the poll by a comfortable margin. Read Sara F.'s comments and you'll see why the 1956 movie beat out two other Hollywood remakes of the story. It's actually pretty good: convincingly acted, with a tight, well-written script that casts an interesting reflection on 1950s cold war paranoia. (And, yes, KRL has it. Get it, and let me know what you think.)

Sara F., Thanks for the comments. I think I'll pass on the 2007 Invasion! Thanks for the head's up.